This message was deleted.
# helpb
broad-zoo-34077
08/07/2023, 4:56 PMThis message was deleted.
b
busy-agent-35515
08/07/2023, 5:22 PMHello! Could you please explain what you’re trying to accomplish? Or what is the problem? :)
a
ancient-jewelry-73631
08/07/2023, 5:26 PMhey Vadim! Let’s say I’m expecting higher traffic, so I would increase the MaxSize for my autoscaling group from 2 to 5. Looks like right now infracost won’t detect this change that could potentially increase my cloud costs - it would simply say there’s no difference. If I want to see how much it could potentially cost me to run 5 instances instead of 2, I would have to increase the MinSize to 5 as well
ancient-jewelry-73631
08/07/2023, 5:26 PMI’m honestly not sure how I would handle this scenario of the cost increasing potentially if the autoscaling action occurs
b
busy-agent-35515
08/07/2023, 6:21 PMCan you try setting infracost-usage.yml file with the following?
Copy code
version: 0.1
resource_usage:
aws_autoscaling_group.<CHANGE ME>:
instances: 15 # Number of instances in the autoscaling group.busy-agent-35515
08/07/2023, 6:22 PMAnd then try running
infracost breakdown --path=. --usage-file=infracost-usage.ymla
ancient-jewelry-73631
08/07/2023, 6:36 PMI’ll give that a try on another project later where autoscaling groups are already provisioned. This was for a new project
ancient-jewelry-73631
08/07/2023, 6:36 PMI’d need to provide an asg name instead <CHANGE ME>, right?
b
busy-agent-35515
08/07/2023, 6:37 PMCorrect
busy-agent-35515
08/07/2023, 6:37 PMThis is a usage mapping to your resources
72 Views