This message was deleted Infracost Community #contributors

$https://infracost.io logo$

Join Slack

This message was deleted.

# contributors

broad-zoo-34077

02/06/2023, 1:38 PM

This message was deleted.

👀 1

little-author-61621

02/06/2023, 1:52 PM

@stocky-magazine-90066 which resource are you adding the new cost to? The

aws_lambda_function

or the

aws_lambda_provisioned_concurrency_config

stocky-magazine-90066

02/06/2023, 2:06 PM

Hi @little-author-61621 I was looking to add

aws_lambda_provisioned_concurrency_config

as a new resource, but the resource needs some information from

aws_lambda_function

which I thought I could do via the reference attributes.

stocky-magazine-90066

02/06/2023, 2:06 PM

Or maybe I'm actually thinking about this in the wrong way.

stocky-magazine-90066

02/06/2023, 2:12 PM

With some of the examples I looked at on the pricing page, provisioned concurrency is a separate charge. A common use case looks to be that provisioned concurrency isn't enabled 24 x 7 . So I was going to look at implementing this as a separate resource & provide the concurrency usage separate values. But maybe I was getting to far ahead & I wanted to include somethings from the lambda function. The only thing I actually need at the moment when I'm thinking out loud is the Architecture for the function, as there's a cost difference for ARM v x86. Which as an initial thought could be a usage parameter.

little-author-61621

02/06/2023, 2:13 PM

yeah, looking at it now it seems like it makes sense to treat it as a separate resource. I think what you might want is this on the

aws_lambda_provisioned_concurrency_config

resource:

Copy code

ReferenceAttributes: []string{"function_name"}

And then this on the

aws_lambda_function

resource so it knows to use

function_name

as an identifer:

Copy code

CustomRefIDFunc: func(d *schema.ResourceData) []string {
  name := d.Get("function_name").String()
  if name != "" {
    return []string{name}
  }

  return nil
}

stocky-magazine-90066

02/06/2023, 2:16 PM

Thanks @little-author-61621 I think initially I was possibly over complicating it. I think I've a clearer path forward for an initial stab.

little-author-61621

02/06/2023, 2:17 PM

👍 great! lmk if I can help more

7 Views

Open in Slack

Previous Next