Hi wave I just opened a MR on the `infracost gitlab ci` proj

Question

Hi wave I just opened a MR on the `infracost gitlab ci` project I just want to add the ` gitlab server url` in all the examples using the `infracost comment gitlab` as this flag must be set when using infracost on self hosted instance I can see that the whole pipeline is in a failure state and I m sorry for that But before going any further please let me know if these modifications make sense for you and in that case do not hesitate to guide me to fix that pipelines to make a better MR slightly smiling face Here is the MR Thanks for your help

busy-agent-35515 · Answer

Hi Kevin Thank you for creating the MR Our examples use cloud GitLab version that is why they don t mention the server URL as we assume it s a default way users use GitLab However they don t communicate explicitly how to set the URL for self hosted version And we mention it just once here <https www infracost io docs features cli commands gitlab>

busy-agent-35515 · Answer

I think adding the flag is useful maybe we can add a remark that the flag is not necessary for cloud version I ll look at the MR in couple minutes will reply back if I spot any issues

billions-application-10929 · Answer

Hi Vadim thank you for your quick answer wink Let me know if I can help

busy-agent-35515 · Answer

Will do slightly smiling face +1

busy-agent-35515 · Answer

< billions application 10929> It seems like the CI runs on your project and the error message `Error Invalid API key` suggests that you need to specify `INFRACOST API KEY` env var in CI CD settings here Could you please try that

busy-agent-35515 · Answer

Added the same comment to the MR for visibility slightly smiling face

billions-application-10929 · Answer

I just added a comment on the MR with the key api I m able to go further but it looks like the golden files are now causing trouble And in fact I m not able to generate them on my laptop please see the comment

billions-application-10929 · Answer

If you have questions feel free to ask slightly smiling face

busy-agent-35515 · Answer

Oh right my bad I missed the golden files sweat smile I can run the tests myself and push the changes to your branch Thanks for signing the CLA slightly smiling face

busy-agent-35515 · Answer

Seems like we have an issue running the golden files update by contributors first as you mentioned you don t have access for the private module repo so this test would fail Second Infracost uses the repo name as project name so our golden files will change from `infracost infracost gitlab ci examples ` to `kfrapin infracost gitlab ci examples ` which might be okay for your local runs but should not be merged to the upstream We need to work on that to fix it slightly smiling face And for your MR I would assume we can skip CI as your change should not modify the golden files I m going to approve and merge it slightly smiling face Seems like you are the first contributor who ran the golden file update First we use Infracost private repo for testing the private modules obviously you won t have access by default secon

billions-application-10929 · Answer

Happy to help and thank you for your time and explanations wink

busy-agent-35515 · Answer

Of course thank you for your time too If I can take another minute from you may I ask how you find your experience with Infracost Does it do what you expect Maybe you can provide some feedback so we can improve it more

billions-application-10929 · Answer

I m using Infracost since July 2021 and I have to say that everything is pretty straightforward at least in my point of view I use it for AWS cloud only and it s setup in multiple Terraform projects under Gitlab CI CD So yeah it gives me what I want a view on my costs before making any apply in a well integrated way with Gitlab Infracost is a great product slightly smiling face

busy-agent-35515 · Answer

Awesome Glad it is useful for you Thank you infraheart