Infracost scans for Terraform code changes and checks over 3 million prices to create a simple, understandable cost estimate before any resources are launched.

Infracost Community

1. I think both make sense however I think usage is more descriptive than variable.
2. I personally find the total cost valuable though I see your point wrt it maybe being confusing. Maybe it would be good to include new total cost near the top as like a summary alongside the Cost Checks? Monthly <https://gist.github.com/alikhajeh1/7b3c0c88fa9f2aee35da6e344b46fe35|fixed costs> will decrease by $1,393 and <https://gist.github.com/alikhajeh1/7b3c0c88fa9f2aee35da6e344b46fe35|variable costs> will decrease by $300. New Total Cost: $8,930 
3. I’m not sure how I feel about it. Do you have any mockups of what that might look like?
4. New comment looks pretty clean :smile: 


Thanks <@U03TUSUE74Z>! Do like option 3 in <https://github.com/alikhajeh1/example-terraform/pull/28|this PR more>?
Regarding your qustion #3, the above options show “This pull request also has” list that describes the sorts of things it would flag.

`it seems confusing to combine fixed and variable costs into one figure`

Variable costs, by definition, cannot be guaranteed to be correct at the point you evaluate them in the PR pipeline so the word `estimated` needs to be super obvious in any message.