Hi Infracost team, Can you give me a rough estimate when you think support for CloudFormation will be offered? I've seen the Github issue (#190) but was wondering if you had a general idea of when it will be available. Thanks

Hey everyone! I’ve been trying to setup Infracost in CircleCI pipeline and managed to

generate an Infracost JSON file as the baseline
+ 
generate a diff by comparing the latest code change with the baseline

and the Infracost PR comments gets published as expected, however for some reason the

infracost

estimate remains:

unchanged

every time and it does not seem to update 📉 and 📈 emojis as changes are pushed --- What I’ve checked so far:

[x] CircleCI Box: /tmp dir structure

.
├── base
├── circle-agent-runner.pid
├── circleci-1594698576
├── circleci-ts.sock
├── infracost.json
└── infracost-base.json

[x] ran cost estimate breakdown locally 
infracost breakdown --path .

It produced all the cloud resources that got detected while on the PR it showed only the ones that got changed --- on local and on the PR the overall cost however matches as expected! 

[?] as I have CircleCI orb [circleci/terraform@3.1.0] for terraform, did terraform show -json plan.out > infracost-base.json so I can persist it and attach it within the Infracost job but somehow got lost on the way and not sure if that is needed as Infracost job itself already produced the terraform plan ...

Any advise or direction on how to continue will be greatly appreciated!

Hello 🙂 I keep running into the following error:

2022-10-06T08:59:59.1441536Z Error: Failed to parse the Terragrunt code using the Terragrunt library:
2022-10-06T08:59:59.1442071Z 2 errors occurred:
2022-10-06T08:59:59.1442563Z 	* invalid character ',' looking for beginning of value
2022-10-06T08:59:59.1443145Z 	* invalid character ',' looking for beginning of value

i couldn't find anything posted about it previously on the channel and seems like the one github issue raised about this was never solved: https://github.com/infracost/infracost/issues/1947 this error shows up both with multiple and single directory usage. Would love to hear some tips about how to go around this 🙂

📣 Hey everyone, join us for the October community call tomorrow where I’ll give a demo of: • the new

resource_type_default_usage

section of the usage file, so you can create separate files for different traffic profiles for things like S3 or Lambda, e.g. low/medium/high. • Weekly reports • GitHub App integration We’ll also have time to discuss other topics that the community wants to cover. 👉 Calendar invite and Zoom link: https://github.com/infracost/infracost/issues/2030 (I’ll share the recording afterwards)

Here’s a recording of the Oct call: See you in November!

👋 Hey everyone, as we scale to a larger community (almost 700 people here!) it’s becoming clear that we need a dedicated #help channel so we can keep #general for discussions, feedback, intro and announcements. We also have #contributors if you’d like to work on the code base. There are quite a few advanced users here and it would help us a lot if you can also join #help to help new community members with questions/issues :infraheart:

Hi Team, i am trying to build Cloud-Pricing API image locally (as we can’t use internet version), question is…if i use base image as node 18, should not be an issue right?

Infracost v0.10.13 has been released! 😛artyparrot: This release has several bug fixes but the most exciting thing to me is that it lays the groundwork for automatic usage estimates:

Infracost can now automatically estimate usage for AWS Lambda, S3, and DynamoDB using data from your cloud bill 📉💰. We’ll be adding coverage for more resources in future releases. Read more about the private beta here: https://www.infracost.io/docs/infracost_cloud/actual_costs/ or reach out to us at hello@infracost.io.

Thanks to everyone who contributed or raised issues!

Hey everyone, we just released a pull request status filter for Infracost Cloud so you can filter on: • open PRs when reviewing the most expensive PRs. • on merged|deployed PRs when reviewing which PRs impacted your actual costs most. The PR status works out of the box for GitHub App integration, and you can also use our API to set the status for other CI/CD systems. Let us know if you have any feedback or run into any issues with it!

Hi, we have been using infracost for a while to put comments in PR on github enterprise with atlantis. Now, we would like to use the Dashboard. Although I can see estimates under Repos for various repos, I am not able to get past step 4 (Set up one of our ci/cd integrations). We have a post workflow hook:

post_workflow_hooks:

- run: |

# In order to stop commenting on PRs twice we need to check

# if the Infracost output directory created in our 'plan' stage exists before continuing.

if [ ! -d "/infracost/$BASE_REPO_OWNER-$BASE_REPO_NAME-$PULL_NUM" ]; then

exit 0

fi

infracost comment github --repo $BASE_REPO_OWNER/$BASE_REPO_NAME \

--pull-request $PULL_NUM \

--path /infracost/$BASE_REPO_OWNER-$BASE_REPO_NAME-$PULL_NUM/'*'.json \

--github-api-url $GH_API_URL \

--github-token $ATLANTIS_GH_TOKEN \

--behavior hide-and-new

`# remove the Infracost output directory so that

infracost comment

is not # triggered on an `atlantis apply``

rm -rf /infracost/$BASE_REPO_OWNER-$BASE_REPO_NAME-$PULL_NUM

📣 November update: Actual costs, data transfer costs, and pull requests status filters! This month, we have a few big changes: • Actual costs and data transfer costs are in private beta. • See the status of all pull requests (open, merged, closed, deployed) and filter based on that to see their cost impact. • Slice and dice for all! Export to CSV. • Buy Infracost without talking to Hassan 😁 and public pricing.

Hey everyone, the November community call is today at 11:00 Los Angeles (PDT) = 14:00 New York (EDT) = 20:00 Berlin (CEST), convert to your timezone (I had to move it by an hour due to day-light-savings confusions, sorry). Zoom meeting: https://us06web.zoom.us/j/99421485564 Meeting ID: 994 2148 5564

📣 For users who use the Infracost GitHub App, we just released a feature where the pull request: • labels (list) • approved by (list) • merged by are fetched and shown in Infracost Cloud and the CSV Export. This enables you to see a full audit trail of cost changes for pull requests.

Hey Guys! Infracost is on Volume 27 of TW's Technology Guide: Technology Radar! It's in the tools quadrant (#70)! :infraheart: https://www.thoughtworks.com/radar

Hi Guys I am trying to get the usage based cost for azure managed disks but it doesn't seem to calculate the cost from an array based resources .

version: 0.1
resource_usage:
  azurerm_managed_disk.DATA[0]:        
    monthly_disk_operations: 100000000 
  ....

result using the usal file . anything created using a index isn't considered although I saw no warning.

Name                                              Monthly Qty  Unit            Monthly Cost (CAD)

 azurerm_linux_virtual_machine.curavm
 ├─ Instance usage (pay as you go, Standard_M8ms)          750  hours                    $1,693.75
 └─ os_disk
    ├─ Storage (S4)                                          1  months                       $2.26
    └─ Disk operations                                  10,000  10k operations               $6.68

 azurerm_managed_disk.BIN
 ├─ Storage (S10)                                            1  months                       $8.65
 └─ Disk operations                                     10,000  10k operations               $6.68

 azurerm_managed_disk.DATA[0]
 └─ Storage (P20)                                            1  months                      $97.83
...etc

Hi guys, just testing out Infracost. I was surprised that changing region has no effect on costs, neither changing the node type… Check it out here Does that look good? I changed from 20 to 40 nodes and yes, it reflected this, but not the costs mentioned earlier

Hi everyone, as a thank you to all you open source contributors, users, star-ers and feedback givers, we are going to discount Infracost Cloud by 40% till the end of this year. $30/seat/month for Infracost Cloud instead of $50/seat/month. If anyone is interested in seeing the end to end demo for management teams or FinOps teams, let me know - happy to give live demos and answer questions: hassan.hosseini@infracost.io 🙏🏽 🎉