Have we ever considered removing 0 cost line items from `inf

Question

Have we ever considered removing 0 cost line items from `infracost breakdown` output It might help focus attention on the meaningful numbers

white-airport-8778 · Answer

huh that s an interesting thought I hadn t considered it as I thought it s useful to explain how things are priced for the user even if we don t know the costs upfront It might be worth exploring something like ` show skipped` for this though

blue-toothbrush-24598 · Answer

for cost depends on usage lines it def makes sense to see them there but if usage and price are known and their product is 0 for a given cost component it might make sense to skip displaying that component and possibly skip displaying an entire resource if its cost is 0

blue-toothbrush-24598 · Answer

as for the CLI UX of such a feature I wonder if a ` verbose` flag would be appropriate initially this only makes sense for `breakdown` but someday we might figure out what verbose means for `diff` or other subcommands

blue-toothbrush-24598 · Answer

anyhow bigger fish to fry just now but I might tackle this sometime down the road

white-airport-8778 · Answer

gt if usage and price are known and their product is 0 for a given cost component it might make sense to skip displaying that component and possibly skip displaying an entire resource if its cost is 0 Makes sense We skip 0 cost and free resources altogether when defining them in a resource go file