This message was deleted.
# contributorsb
broad-zoo-34077
08/28/2021, 5:28 PMThis message was deleted.
đź‘Ť 1
w
white-airport-8778
08/28/2021, 6:01 PM
huh, that’s an interesting thought, I hadn’t considered it as I thought it’s useful to explain how things are priced for the user even if we don’t know the costs upfront. It might be worth exploring something like
--show-skippedb
blue-toothbrush-24598
08/28/2021, 6:07 PMfor "cost depends on usage" lines, it def makes sense to see them there .. but if usage and price are known, and their product is 0 for a given cost component - it might make sense to skip displaying that component (and possibly skip displaying an entire resource, if its cost is 0).
blue-toothbrush-24598
08/28/2021, 6:10 PMas for the CLI UX of such a feature, I wonder if a
--verbosebreakdowndiffblue-toothbrush-24598
08/28/2021, 6:10 PManyhow -- bigger fish to fry just now, but I might tackle this sometime down the road.
w
white-airport-8778
08/28/2021, 7:40 PM
if usage and price are known, and their product is 0 for a given cost component - it might make sense to skip displaying that component (and possibly skip displaying an entire resource, if its cost is 0).Makes sense! We skip 0 cost and free resources altogether when defining them in a resource.go file
6 Views