Hello Team, We are utilising Infracost to estimate monthly costs for org’s GCP resources. We are running 3 clusters in our GCP project of

Location Type: Zonal

. I believe it is not supported by infracost. Correct me if am wrong here.

Or is it for

zonal

clusters under free tier ??

Hey, I want to pass a step even in GH actions even if infracost runs into an error like this, is that a possibility?

Hey - we’re just getting started with Infrascost today, and have a question about the previous cost. Is there a way to dry-run the terraform code, so the tool knows what we have deployed already with terraform?

Hi, I am trying to add infracost to the CICD using this Quick Start: https://github.com/infracost/actions We use Terragrunt and the folder structure is something like this:

./tf-repo
├── .github
│   └── workflow.yml
└── infras
    ├── account1
    │   └── us-east-1
    │       ├── app1
    │       │   └── <http://main.tf|main.tf>
    │       ├── app2
    │       │   └── <http://main.tf|main.tf>
    │       └── app3
    │           └── <http://main.tf|main.tf>
    └── account2

The PR integration is in-place and the infracost check runs successfully but nothing is displayed on the dashboard. how is the usage file supposed to work? The folder depth is 5 from the root.

Hi everyone. Is there a way to peek at the GraphQL query generated by

infracost

? Our team doesn't use Terraform, but I'm interested in the

Cloud Pricing API

server. I'm looking to dynamically construct a GraphQL query to submit to a self-hosted

Cloud Pricing

server, and I'm looking to see how

infracost breakdown

works. Taking this Terraform example:

$ cat <http://ec2_simple.tf|ec2_simple.tf>
resources "aws_instance" "my-web-service" {
  instance_type = "t2.micro"
}

Running

infracost breakdown -p .

gives us:

OVERALL TOTAL $9.27

. I'm looking to see what the GraphQL query looks like in this simple example, then to construct larger Terraform files to see how the query changes.

Hello Team, Can you confirm that all the supported GCP resource are ‘not’ in https://github.com/infracost/infracost/blob/master/infracost-usage-example.yml

Does this look incorrect? AWS RDS price 0 even though it is not free tier: size is

db.t3.medium

. The infracost says class is mock, little weird. Latest release 0.10.18 and command used was:

infracost breakdown --path .

in the folder that has the tf files and tfvars etc. This stack is live.

Name                                                                       Monthly Qty  Unit                    Monthly Cost 
 module.dss_comp_database.aws_db_instance.postgres[0]                                                                         
 ├─ Database instance (on-demand, Single-AZ, db_instance_class-mock)                730  hours                          $0.00 
 └─ Storage (general purpose SSD, gp2)                                               20  GB                             $2.54

Hi! Does the Cloud Pricing API have an OpenAPI specification?

Hi, might sounds like a odd question. I am using the infracost tool inside Visual studio code, when it runs it creates an manifest file. I presume this shouldn't be checked into the repo?

infracost comment github --path /tmp/infracost.json --repo juliusoh/portfolio-aws-terraform --github-token ${{ github.token }} --behavior=update --commit $GITHUB_SHA

Errors with

POST <https://api.github.com/repos/juliusoh/portfolio-aws-terraform/commits/8ebabc614fa7b69c006ea450661a2026c40ac179/comments>: 403 Resource not accessible by integration []

Hi, I’m trying to troubleshoot an issue that is showing up the cost showing up as below picture (basically previous cost is $0). This is definitely wrong since all I did is making the rds instance size larger so should be much lower cost. I did run locally using infracost breakdown, then infracost diff. It shows the correct number. This is my setup in atlantis:

- run: terragrunt show -json "$$PLANFILE" > "$$SHOWFILE"
      - run: |
            infracost breakdown --path="$$SHOWFILE" \
                                --format=json \
                                --log-level=info \
                                --out-file="$$INFRACOST_OUTPUT" \
                                --project-name="$$REPO_REL_DIR"
      - run: |
                    infracost comment github --repo xxx \
                                   --pull-request $$PULL_NUM \
                                   --path $$INFRACOST_OUTPUT \
                                   --github-token $$ATLANTIS_GH_TOKEN \
                                   --tag $$INFRACOST_COMMENT_TAG \
                                   --behavior new

I guess I’m trying to understand generally why we don’t need infracost diff inside cicd set up. I’m using terragrunt with atlantis as my set up. Any help would be appreciated, many thanks

Hi, in the infracost.yml file, can we override the location property per project? To remove the warning

Using eastus for resource module.network.azurerm_virtual_network_peering.vnet_hub_adm as its 'location' property could not be found.

as infracost is not picking up the region

Hello there. I was about creating a workflow.yml for gh action and had an issue. So I have multiple pipeline in 1 workflow (terrafrom fmt, checkov etc...), and all these pipelines can run

on: pull_request

but Infracost syntax runs only with this syntax

on: [pull_request]

. Is there any other option to fix this issue? Thank you in advance.

Good morning. I'm looking for the file that has the

Azure Container App

resource file. I'm looking in

infracost/internal/resources/azure/

I'd like to see what the default values are, as I'm trying to understand how the GQL query is constructed

I'm learning how the GraphQL query generation works. If one of the

schema.AttributeFilter

s is removed, will the

Cloud Pricing API Server

respond successfully? E.g.:

// computeCostComponent returns a cost component for server compute requirements.                                                                                                           
func (r *PostgreSQLFlexibleServer) computeCostComponent() *schema.CostComponent {                                                                                                           
    attrs := getFlexibleServerFilterAttributes(r.Tier, r.InstanceType, r.InstanceVersion)                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                                                                            
    return &schema.CostComponent{                                                                                                                                                           
        Name:           fmt.Sprintf("Compute (%s)", r.SKU),                                                                                                                                 
        Unit:           "hours",                                                                                                                                                            
        UnitMultiplier: decimal.NewFromInt(1),                                                                                                                                              
        HourlyQuantity: decimalPtr(decimal.NewFromInt(1)),                                                                                                                                  
        ProductFilter: &schema.ProductFilter{                                                                                                                                               
            VendorName:    strPtr("azure"),                                                                                                                                                 
            Region:        strPtr(r.Region),                                                                                                                                                
            Service:       strPtr("Azure Database for PostgreSQL"),                                                                                                                         
            ProductFamily: strPtr("Databases"),                                                                                                                                             
            AttributeFilters: []*schema.AttributeFilter{                                                                                                                                    
                {Key: "productName", ValueRegex: strPtr(fmt.Sprintf("/^Azure Database for PostgreSQL Flexible Server %s %s/i", attrs.TierName, attrs.Series))}, // <-------------                            
                {Key: "skuName", ValueRegex: regexPtr(fmt.Sprintf("^%s$", attrs.SKUName))}, // <-------------                                                                                                 
                {Key: "meterName", ValueRegex: regexPtr(fmt.Sprintf("^%s$", attrs.MeterName))}, // <-------------                                                                                             
            },                                                                                                                                                                              
        },                                                                                                                                                                                  
        PriceFilter: &schema.PriceFilter{                                                                                                                                                   
            PurchaseOption: strPtr("Consumption"),                                                                                                                                          
        },                                                                                                                                                                                  
    }                                                                                                                                                                                       
}

When `POST`ing to a local

Cloud Pricing API

server, I get this:

~/cloud-pricing-api $ curl -X POST <http://localhost:4000>
{"error":"Invalid API key"}

What is the format for including the API credential in the

POST

request?

This message was deleted.

Hi, I’m currently experimenting with the usage file and trying to use reserve instance cost instead of on demand. Do you maybe have an example of what it looks like for changes like changing xlarge instance to 2xlarge instance for reserved instance (all upfront)? I know the monthly cost is 0 since it charge by yearly so I would love to see how the UI looks like before switching to it. Many thanks

Hello all. I'm still trying to understand the

infracost/infracost

source code, as I am building a custom interface to the

Cloud Pricing API Server

(we do not use

terraform

). I am looking at

internal/providers/terraform/azure/application_gateway.go

, and see the following: • Data processing cost component • Capacity units cost component • Gateway cost component • Fixed for V2 cost component For a custom interface to the pricing API, is the GraphQL query a composite of the 4 price components? E.g. the 4 need to get calculated then added up?

Hey guys, trying to test infra cost github integration -> provided ssh key and token everything per guide. Failing on the read operation to our internal modules (indeed all access provided and ssh key is tested that everything works for gitclone) Any chance by theory it can be due to our reference to TAG ? aka

git clone '<ssh://git@github.com/contentsquare/platform_terraform_modules.git?ref=7.24.7>'

which will indeed fail than maybe drop to wrong error handling? some direction appreciated 🙏

Hey! Why is the price returned by the GCP console so different to what the API returns? Am I missing something? Many thanks in advance for the help!

Hello, Trying to test infracost to see how it works .. using the cli i can generate the cost estimate json using:

infracost.exe breakdown --path ./terraform/ --terraform-var-file ./vars/uat.tfvars --format json --out-file infracost-base-uat2.json
infracost.exe upload --path infracost-base-uat2.json

But when I use the comment command i am getting an error (trying to get data on the dashboard)

infracost.exe comment gitlab --repo /path/to/repo --merge-request 17 --path=infracost-base-uat2.json --gitlab-token xxxxxxxxx --gitlab-server-url <https://baseurl.com>
Estimate uploaded to organization 'xxx' in Infracost Cloud
Error: The pull request comment was generated successfully but could not be posted:
Error creating comment: 404 Not Found

Wondering if you have an idea why

Hello, is there a way to remove GitHub App integration and start over in Infracost? While adding GitHub App integration, I accidentally removed the app from GitHub organization, but Infracost still waits on GitHub admin approval. Now, I cannot continue with the integration or cancel it.

Hello, hopefully a quick question - should Infracost (v0.10.19) correctly handle for_each constructs within the terraform configuration? I'm trying to analyse the cost of a k8s cluster with a variable number of non-default node pools. I'm only seeing one line for these in the output, and the node type is wrong for it, resulting in zero cost

azurerm_kubernetes_cluster.k8s

├─ Uptime SLA                                                   730  hours         $73.00

└─ default_node_pool

└─ Instance usage (pay as you go, Standard_E8ds_v4)          730  hours        $420.48

azurerm_kubernetes_cluster_node_pool.worker

├─ Instance usage (pay as you go, Standard_)                    730  hours          $0.00

└─ os_disk

└─ Storage (P10, LRS)                                          1  months        $19.71

Hello, just a quick question. 🙂 Is there any way how to write comments to

infracost-usage.yml

without them being erased with the next

--sync-usage-file

? My intention is to write helpful comments for the rest of team why some usage param was chosen how it was chosen. E.g.

azurerm_monitor_action_group.default:
    monthly_notifications: 90 # 1 notification per every day per every environment

Now it seems that some comments get persisted (when there was a generic comment on the line generated before), but others get erased. Is there some special comment syntax to instruct the sync functionality to ignore that particular comments and leave them in the file? Or some other way how to achieve what I'm trying to achieve? 🙂

using the infracost CLI, is there a way to view the estimated cost using the

terraform.tfstate

file instead of the plan? basically, if a user changes values in the params file and saves, but doesn't deploy, we don't want an updated cost based on the params. we just want to know the estimated cost based on what's listed in the state file 🤞

Hello all, infracosts noob here. I have the generic .gitlab-ci.yml configured as per https://gitlab.com/infracost/infracost-gitlab-ci. I'm using Terraform Cloud to trigger speculative plans on commits to feature branches. I'm seeing 2 issues with Infracosts: 1. The Previous and New costs appear to be reversed. None of the infrastructure exists, and the terraform plan shows 50+ resources to deploy. I'm expecting the costs to increase, not decrease.

Project                                   Previous  New   Diff
gitlab/terraform-project/development      $369      $0    -$368.80

2. The "Getting Started" configuration on my Infracosts Dashboard is not recognising this pull request, so is stuck on

Step 6. Send a test pull request to see the cost estimate

Hello, I have a question regarding the integration of Infracost in a Gitlab CI. Currently, I have an error that I don't understand: for the command (infracost comment gitlab), I received: 'Error: required flag(s) "gitlab-token", "repo" not set' But when I echo the command, all variables have the right values and my access token has the api scope and the owner role.