Sean Callanan
04/20/2022, 2:41 PMSina Bakhtiari
04/25/2022, 5:31 PMNicolás Martin Tobías
04/29/2022, 10:22 AMError: Failed to download module
Could not download module "backend_embedded_finance" (<http://main.tf:356|main.tf:356>) source
code from "git::<https://github.com/getritmo/infra-tf-service.git?ref=1.1>":
error downloading '<https://github.com/getritmo/infra-tf-service.git?ref=1.1>':
Nicolás Martin Tobías
04/29/2022, 10:23 AMKevin Frapin
05/06/2022, 9:16 AMinfracost-gitlab-ci
project (https://gitlab.com/infracost/infracost-gitlab-ci)
I just want to add the --gitlab-server-url
in all the examples using the infracost comment gitlab
, as this flag must be set when using infracost on self-hosted instance
I can see that the whole pipeline is in a failure state, and I'm sorry for that
But before going any further, please let me know if these modifications make sense for you, and in that case, do not hesitate to guide me to fix that pipelines to make a better MR 🙂
Here is the MR: https://gitlab.com/infracost/infracost-gitlab-ci/-/merge_requests/39
Thanks for your helpDuncan
05/11/2022, 8:03 AMCarmelo Riolo
05/18/2022, 9:58 PMHany Mhajna
05/24/2022, 2:17 PMRick
05/25/2022, 5:25 AMAli (Infracost)
07/07/2022, 5:49 PMJohannes Grumböck
07/08/2022, 5:23 AM.infracost
folder everywhere it finds terraform code. It’s a little bit tedious to extend all the .gitignore
files - also from other open-source projects, where I not even want to commit/push that change.
Would it be better if infracost would store the “temporary” files in some other shadow tree under $HOME
? Don’t know …
How do others think about it?
Cheers, JoHilton Lem
07/11/2022, 3:21 PMVivian Hunt
07/12/2022, 11:06 AMSawyer Ward
07/12/2022, 10:17 PMSina Bakhtiari
07/30/2022, 6:25 AMBalázs Marján
08/12/2022, 2:06 PMsync-usage-file
option helps them out here by providing a usage file with default values(mostly 0s). Do you see a way this could be improved by somehow providing reasonable defaults, something like the contents of the infracost-usage-example.yml
. Perhaps somehow leveraging that file. Do you see any value here?
2, The user already has their estimate and usage file but they add a new resource that’s type matches an already existing one in the configuration. When using the sync-usage-file
option, could option leverage the already existing usage estimates for the existing resource type for the same type of resource that was just added? Again, do you think there is any value here?
Thanks!Hilton Lem
08/19/2022, 3:05 PMBurak
08/23/2022, 2:17 PMTim (Infracost)
08/30/2022, 1:20 PMTimothy
09/21/2022, 6:51 AMterraform {
required_providers {
confluent = {
source = "confluentinc/confluent"
version = "1.3.0"
}
}
}
I’m a bit rusty with Golang, but if its not too silly, I’m prepared to create a card and have a go with it.Alistair (Infracost)
10/10/2022, 10:48 AMFatih Tokus
10/13/2022, 1:28 PMFatih Tokus
10/13/2022, 1:31 PMFatih Tokus
10/13/2022, 1:31 PM-──────────────────────────────────
-
-The following projects have no cost estimate changes: infracost/infracost/cmd/infracost/testdata/terraform_v0.14_nochange_plan.json
-Run the following command to see their breakdown: infracost breakdown --path=/path/to/code
-
-──────────────────────────────────
-
-
-</details>
-
+💰 Infracost estimate: monthly cost will not change
+<table>
+ <thead>
+ <td>Project</td>
+ <td>Previous</td>
+ <td>New</td>
+ <td>Diff</td>
+ </thead>
+ <tbody>
+ <tr>
+ <td>infracost/infracost/cmd/infraco...aform_v0.14_nochange_plan.json</td>
+ <td align="right">$40.56</td>
+ <td align="right">$40.56</td>
+ <td>$0</td>
+ </tr>
+ </tbody>
+</table>
+
+<details>
+<summary><strong>Infracost output</strong></summary>
+
+```
+──────────────────────────────────
+
+The following projects have no cost estimate changes: infracost/infracost/cmd/infracost/testdata/terraform_v0.14_nochange_plan.json
+Run the following command to see their breakdown: infracost breakdown --path=/path/to/code
+
+──────────────────────────────────
+
+```
+</details>
+
+
--- FAIL: TestOutputFormatGitHubCommentNoChange (0.06s)
--- FAIL: TestOutputFormatGitHubCommentNoChange/HCL (0.06s)Johannes Grumböck
10/14/2022, 8:02 AM❯ INFRACOST_LOG_LEVEL=debug go test -v -cover ./internal/providers/terraform/aws/fsx_windows_file_system_test.go
=== RUN TestFSXWindowsFS
=== PAUSE TestFSXWindowsFS
=== CONT TestFSXWindowsFS
=== RUN TestFSXWindowsFS/HCL
level=warning msg=“Multiple products with prices found for aws_fsx_windows_file_system.my_file_system_ssd SSD storage, using the first product”
testutil.go:202: Unexpected log write. To capture logs remove t.Parallel and use GoldenFileOptions { CaptureLogs = true }: level=warning msg=“Multiple products with prices found for aws_fsx_windows_file_system.my_file_system_ssd SSD storage, using the first product”
level=warning msg=“Multiple products with prices found for aws_fsx_windows_file_system.my_system_ssd SSD storage, using the first product”
testutil.go:202: Unexpected log write. To capture logs remove t.Parallel and use GoldenFileOptions { CaptureLogs = true }: level=warning msg=“Multiple products with prices found for aws_fsx_windows_file_system.my_system_ssd SSD storage, using the first product”
=== RUN TestFSXWindowsFS/Terraform_CLI
level=warning msg=“Multiple products with prices found for aws_fsx_windows_file_system.my_file_system_ssd SSD storage, using the first product”
testutil.go:202: Unexpected log write. To capture logs remove t.Parallel and use GoldenFileOptions { CaptureLogs = true }: level=warning msg=“Multiple products with prices found for aws_fsx_windows_file_system.my_file_system_ssd SSD storage, using the first product”
level=warning msg=“Multiple products with prices found for aws_fsx_windows_file_system.my_system_ssd SSD storage, using the first product”
testutil.go:202: Unexpected log write. To capture logs remove t.Parallel and use GoldenFileOptions { CaptureLogs = true }: level=warning msg=“Multiple products with prices found for aws_fsx_windows_file_system.my_system_ssd SSD storage, using the first product”
--- FAIL: TestFSXWindowsFS (6.62s)
--- FAIL: TestFSXWindowsFS/HCL (0.65s)
--- FAIL: TestFSXWindowsFS/Terraform_CLI (5.97s)
FAIL
coverage: [no statements]
FAIL command-line-arguments 7.180s
FAILWhere would I need to start debugging that? Thanks, Johannes
Rob Houghton
11/13/2022, 11:07 AMRob Houghton
11/16/2022, 1:42 PMJohannes Grumböck
11/25/2022, 10:46 AMHugo (Infracost)
11/25/2022, 10:47 AMHugo (Infracost)
11/25/2022, 10:47 AM